(1) This Procedure supports the General Ledger Governance Policy by: (2) This Procedure applies to all trading entities in the Macquarie University Group, and to all staff involved in the: (3) Refer to the General Ledger Governance Policy. (4) This Procedure document has five parts: (5) The Director, Financial Operations, Tax and Treasury has overall accountability for ensuring adherence to this Procedure for all entities in the Macquarie University Group. (6) Manual journals are used to adjust the financial results of an entity. Strong protocols around the use and quality of journals are a vital internal control which assists in ensuring accuracy and reliability of financial information. (7) The Journal Preparer is responsible for ensuring that the journals they create and upload: (8) The Journal Approver is accountable for ensuring the Journal Preparer has complied with the Procedure requirements listed above. The Journal Approver will only approve journals that comply with this Procedure. (9) All Manual Journal entries must have Supporting Documentation that substantiates the amount and purpose of the journal to a standard that enables the Approver or Reviewer to understand its purpose and validate its accuracy. (10) All calculations must be clearly documented, with methodology and assumptions clearly defined. Information relied on from external sources (e.g., reports) must be documented in sufficient detail, including source and relevant parameters (e.g., dates and other filters) such that a report could be re-extracted or re-obtained, and any associated calculations could be reperformed. (11) All Supporting Documentation must be uploaded into the General Ledger as an attachment to the Manual Journal. (12) All foreseeable and repeated Manual Journals will be documented using a standard Manual Journal Template. This Template will capture the purpose, requirements, key inputs, overview of calculations and expected frequency of the journal, and the location of any supporting material that details the step-by-step instructions for completion of the journal. (13) The Manual Journal Templates must be approved by the Journal Approver and must be formally re-appraised and re-approved annually to ensure that they remain current. Evidence of approval must be retained on file. (14) All Manual Journals must be prepared and approved in accordance with deadlines communicated each month by the Financial Operations team within Group Finance. (15) Each foreseeable Manual Journal will be listed as a separate task in Blackline™, with the expected frequency, due date, Journal Preparer and Journal approver identified. Journals Preparers and Approvers will mark each journal task as complete as they progress through month-end activities in accordance with the published timetable. (16) The relevant Manual Journal Template as well as the step-by-step instructions for completion of each Manual Journal will either be attached to the Blackline™ task, or the digital location of these documents will be included in the Blackline™ task. (17) All Accrual journals must use a journal format which auto-reverses in the following period, such that the full accrual balance needs to be approved each month. (18) The manual journal adjustment of prior year externally audited financial results is not permitted without the written authorisation of the Vice-President, Finance and Resources. (19) The manual journal adjustment of a prior month’s results within the same financial year is not permitted without the written authorization of the Deputy Group Chief Financial Officer. (20) Rotational independent quality control reviews of Manual Journals and their associated written procedures as documented in the Manual Journal Template and step-by-step instructions will be performed by nominated Journal Reviewers who are neither the Preparer nor Approver of the Manual Journal under review. (21) Reviews will focus on journals that are materially large and / or deemed to be high risk because of their inherent nature or complexity of calculation, as well as any other journals that are identified as a cause for concern during month-end Income Statement and Balance Sheet results reviews. (22) A timetable for quality reviews will be prepared by the Director, Financial Operations, Tax and Treasury, for approval by the Deputy Group Chief Financial Officer. The timetable will detail the manual journals to review, due date for review, and nominated Journal Reviewer. Findings from the reviews, including any remediation actions and due dates for improving the quality of the journals or associated procedures, will be summarised by the Director, Financial Operations, Tax and Treasury and communicated to: (23) The Director, Financial Operations, Tax and Treasury will ensure remediation activities are completed in line with the agreed due dates. (24) High quality and timely Balance Sheet account reconciliations are a vital internal control which assists in ensuring accuracy and reliability of financial information. (25) The following Balance Sheet Account types must be reconciled monthly: (26) All other Balance Sheet accounts must be reconciled at least quarterly. The quarterly cycle need not follow the default calendar quarter cycles, to enable the spread of the review over the twelve (12) periods. (27) All Balance Sheet accounts must be reconciled for the December reporting period. (28) Timelines for completion of Balance Sheet Account Reconciliations for all Group entities will be determined by the Director, Financial Operations, Tax and Treasury and formally communicated as part of month-end timetabling communications to all Balance Sheet Reconciliation Preparers, Approvers and Reviewers. (29) Regardless of the system used for storage, a Balance Sheet Account Reconciliation must include: (30) All Balance Sheet Account Reconciliations must include supporting documentation that explains the account, substantiates the closing balance and enables the Balance Sheet Reconciliation Approver to understand its purpose and validate its accuracy. (31) Examples of supporting documentation include, but are not limited to: (32) For sensitive and confidential information, relevant Balance Sheet Reconciliation Approvers will document and implement protocols around document storage and retention in compliance with the Records and Information Management Policy. (33) Segregation of duties between Balance Sheet reconciliation Preparer and Balance Sheet reconciliation Approver is mandatory. (34) The Balance Sheet Reconciliation Preparer must ensure their allocated Balance Sheet Account Reconciliations are created in accordance with the communicated timelines and include all content required by this Procedure. (35) The Balance Sheet Reconciliation Approver is accountable for reviewing the reconciliations, including performing an assessment on the accuracy, completeness, and validity of the reconciliations according to the requirements of this Procedure. (36) Reconciliations that do not meet the standards of this Procedure must not be approved. The Balance Sheet Reconciliation Approver will advise the Balance Sheet Reconciliation Preparer of remedies required to revise the reconciliation for compliance with this Procedure. (37) The Balance Sheet Reconciliation Approver will oversee the action plan for the resolution of any identified Unreconciled Items. (38) All reconciliations will also be assigned a Balance Sheet Reconciliation Reviewer (usually the Finance Director of the Approver). Balance Sheet Reconciliation Reviewers will perform a second quality review of their assigned reconciliation with the following frequency: (39) All entities will use Blackline (where this service is activated) to prepare and approve all Balance Sheet Account Reconciliations. Supporting documentation must be attached to the reconciliation within Blackline. For entities where Blackline is not activated, the Manager, Controlled Entities will manage an alternate digital storage solution, as approved by the Director, Financial Operations, Tax and Treasury. (40) Certain Balance Sheet Account Reconciliations have expected balances that can be predicted in advance due to their inherent nature. Blackline includes a feature to load expected balances and auto-certify accounts which are within a tolerance of this balance. Tolerance is set at $10,000 per Balance Sheet Account Reconciliation. (41) A variety of other auto-certification and account grouping features exist within Blackline. Initial use of these features for each account requires approval by the Director, Financial Operations, Tax and Treasury for each impacted Balance Sheet Account. Approvers for impacted accounts are then required to attest to the Director, Financial Operations, Tax and Treasury, bi-annually, that the auto-certification rules applied to their account, including any preloaded expected balances, are still appropriate for the underlying nature of the account. (42) Unreconciled Items are any component of an account balance that is incorrect, unexplained, has been confirmed as an error or requires further investigation (43) The tolerance thresholds for temporary Unreconciled Items are set at $50,000 per Balance Sheet Account Reconciliation for the University, and 0.1% of full year expenditure for Controlled Entities. Unreconciled Items within this tolerance limit do not require a formal action plan for investigation unless they persist for more than three months. (44) Unreconciled Items with a value above the tolerance thresholds noted above require an action plan for investigation and resolution, in accordance with the following timeframes: (45) The following information will be reported monthly by the Director, Financial Operations, Tax and Treasury to the Deputy Group Chief Financial Officer: (46) Issued monthly reports will be stored in Blackline, to evidence senior personnel quality review. (47) Natural Accounts are used in the General Ledger to group transactions by nature (e.g., wages, income, debtors). These Natural Accounts are then further grouped by hierarchies for internal and external reporting. Appropriate controls around the creation and modification to Natural Accounts and their hierarchies is essential to ensure that financial information is reported accurately and consistently for internal and external stakeholders. (48) Within the University, two Natural Account hierarchies exist: (49) Within the Controlled Entities, other hierarchies exist to cater for internal and external reporting. (50) Requests for new Natural Accounts, modifications to existing Natural Accounts, as well as alterations to the description, purpose or MR and FA Reporting Hierarchies of Natural Accounts, must be made using the Natural Account and Reporting Hierarchy Request Form. (51) Requests must be submitted for review to the Financial Operations team. (52) Requests for New Natural Accounts must specify: (53) Requests for changes to existing Natural Accounts must specify: (54) Requests for changes to the MR or FA Hierarchical mapping of existing Natural Accounts must specify: (55) Requests for changes to the narrative description of MR or FA Hierarchical mapping code, with no change to the mapping of the underlying Natural Accounts of existing Natural Accounts must specify: (56) The Financial Operations Team will issue a monthly timetable detailing: (57) Approvals for changes are determined by the level of impact of the change, as detailed in clause 62 below. (58) A nominated representative within the Financial Operations Team will receive and review all Change Requests and will ensure all necessary finance leadership approvals (as detailed in clause 62 below ) are secured before engaging with the teams responsible for updating the relevant finance systems. Changes will not be made in any system until all necessary approvals are obtained. (59) Once the changes are approved, updates to relevant systems will be processed by the following teams, using standard ticketing processes as relevant for each system: (60) All documentation associated with the Change Request, including all relevant required information specified in this Procedure, plus evidence of required approvals, will be retained on file, noting: (61) A report detailing all changes made each quarter to Natural Accounts and to the FA and MR Reporting Hierarchies will be provided at the end of each quarter by the Manager IT Finance to: the Director, Financial Operations, Tax and Treasury; the Director, Financial Control Tax and Treasury; the Head of Group Financial Planning and Analysis and the Head of Accounting Advisory and Controls. (62) Use the table below to identify all impacts of the proposed change, and seek approval from all relevant approvers: (63) Provision of goods, services and other transactions are routinely made between entities within the Group. These transactions must be identified and eliminated upon consolidation of the Group financial statements, such that the Group financial results only reflect transactions with third parties to the Group. (64) Efficient and accurate identification of inter-company transactions is critical to ensure the accurate elimination of these transactions to enable accurate Group reporting. (65) All inter-company transactions must be recorded using designated inter-company Natural Account codes, which are used exclusively for this purpose. (66) A master list of inter-company Natural Accounts across the Group will be maintained and regularly communicated to all relevant parties by the Financial Operations department. (67) Exceptions to this requirement to use designated inter-company Natural Accounts for an inter-company transaction are limited to minor sundry transactions which are procured via a Point-of-Sale transaction (e.g., purchase of food at a retail outlet owned by a Controlled Entity). Any other exceptions require approval by the Director, Financial Operations, Tax and Treasury and must be communicated by the Director, Financial Operations, Tax and Treasury to the Head of Accounting Advisory and Controls. (68) In situations where one entity within the Group incurs a transaction with a third party (income or expense) and then ‘passes on’ the effect of that transaction to another entity within the Group, these two separate transactions must be recorded in separate Natural Accounts (not netted off within a single Natural Account), such that the second (inter-company) transaction can be isolated. (69) Where such pass-through costs are material, the relevant third-party and associated inter-company Natural Accounts may generally be grouped together within the Management Reporting (MR) Reporting Hierarchy (subject to the requirements of the Part C – Natural Account and Associated Reporting Hierarchy) and Controlled Entity internal reporting hierarchies. These accounts will generally be grouped separately in the Financial Accounting (FA) Reporting Hierarchy and controlled entity statutory reporting hierarchies in Caseware. (70) Where feasible, inter-company transactions will be raised via standard Accounts Receivables invoicing procedures and settled via standard Accounts Payable processes, for ease of identification. (71) Cut-offs for the raising of inter-company invoices will be communicated by the Financial Operations department as part of month-end timetable communications and must be adhered to by all entities. (72) Inter-company transactions that miss the cut-off for invoicing in a particular period may be accrued via Manual Journal, in accordance with Part A - Manual Journal Entry. Evidence of acceptance of the value of the accrual by the counterparty must be included by the Journal Preparer as part of the Supporting Documentation for the journal. (73) Cut-offs for the inter-company accruals for all entities in the Group will be communicated by the Financial Operations department as part of the month-end timetable communications. (74) The Financial Operations team will ensure that closed trial balances, each month, for each entity within the Group, contain complete and reciprocal inter-company transactions. (75) The Financial Operations team will oversee the identification and elimination of inter-company transactions to aid the production of Group financial reports that exclusively reflect third party transactions. (76) Disputed inter-company transactions will be escalated by the Financial Operations team member(s) assigned to oversee inter-company transactions to the Director, Financial Operations, Tax and Treasury with an action plan for resolution, in accordance with the following timeframes: (77) The financial statements provide financial information about the Group that is useful to a wide range of external stakeholders (i.e., existing and potential lenders, rating agencies, Government agencies and donors) in making decisions about providing resources to the Group. (78) Information in these financial statements is deemed to be material if omitting, misstating or obscuring it could reasonably be expected to influence decisions that the primary users of the financial reports make based on those reports.* (79) Materiality may depend on the nature or the magnitude of information, or both. An entity assesses whether information, either individually or in combination with other information, is material in the context of the financial statements taken as a whole.** (80) Auditing standards provide a range of materiality guidance to enable the auditor to carry out their audit procedures and obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement, specifically: (81) Financial Statement Materiality represents the maximum cumulative numerical misstatements in an account balance, class of transactions or other disclosure that the auditor would regard as not influencing the decisions of those financial statements. (82) Benchmarks are used to set materiality and a percentage range is applied based on the nature of the entity and the requirements of the users of the financial statements. (83) Not-for-profit entities typically reference materiality against gross benchmarks (e.g., total assets, revenue or expenses) rather than profitability benchmarks (e.g., profit, net assets).* (84) Due to the judgement required for financial statement materiality, a percentage range is not defined in accounting or auditing standards. (85) A misstatement that is qualitative in nature may still be material if it affects the judgement of a user of the financial statements. Such a qualitative misstatement may include missing or misstated information or notes to the financial statements. Examples include misstatements affecting; (86) All financial statements of all entities within the University Group are audited by the Audit Office of NSW (AONSW). (87) The Audit Office of NSW (AONSW) has indicated to the Audit & Risk Committee that they model materiality for the University sector at 2-3% of expenses. Both quantitative and qualitative characteristics are considered when determining materiality of information. Whilst a financial threshold for materiality can serve as a useful guide, materiality ultimately remains a matter of professional judgement when applied to specific items. (88) AONSW communicates to the University Audit and Risk Committee and to each controlled entity Board any uncorrected misstatements identified during the external annual audit and the effect that these misstatements, individually or in aggregate may have on the financial statements. (89) Misstatements may result from either error or judgement such as: (90) Auditors typically apply a range of c.5-10% of their official materiality limit and also consider qualitative considerations when determining individual misstatements to be communicated to the Audit and Risk Committee. (91) The Audit and Risk Committee is then able to consider if the uncorrected misstatements identified would, either individually or in aggregate, cause a material error in the financial statements. (92) The Audit and Risk Committee generally adopts a lower internal materiality range of 1.5%-2% of expenses for use as a guide when assessing the University Group financial statements and when reviewing any errors identified during the annual external audit and reported to the Audit and Risk Committee by AONSW. (93) Further to the concepts detailed above, in order to produce materially accurate and complete financial statements, materiality thresholds for correcting individual transactions that may have been either incorrectly calculated or omitted during routine month-end scripts/processes are set-out below.* These thresholds assume that all routine month-end scripts/processes are operational and effective. Thresholds may be temporarily reduced by the Financial Operations Director if any of these routine month-end processes become temporarily ineffective. (94) On occasion financial transactions may be posted into the general ledger using incorrect chart parameters (incorrect Natural accounts, Major account). (95) Materiality thresholds for correcting individual transactions with these types of chart geographical errors are as follows: (96) The above financial materiality thresholds discussed in this chapter are summarised as follows: (97) 0.1% - 0.15% of expenses (98) Note that the table below is a guide, due to the qualitative assessments of materiality that will be made dependent on the nature of the error, as detailed in this chapter. (99) Nil. (100) The following definitions apply for the purpose of this Procedure:General Ledger Governance Procedure
Purpose
Scope
Section 1 - Policy
Section 2 - Procedures
Contents
Accountability for adherence to Procedure
Part A - Manual Journal Entry
Background
Responsibilities and Required Actions
Journal Preparer Responsibilities
Journal Approver Responsibilities
Supporting Documentation
Timetable for Submission and Approval of Manual Journals
Use of Blackline™ as a repository and tracking tool for Manual Journals
Accrual Journals
Prior Period Adjustments – between financial years
Prior Period Journals (months within the same financial year)
Rotational Quality Reviews of Manual Journals
Part B - Balance Sheet Account Reconciliation
Background
Responsibilities and Required Actions
Frequency of Reconciliations
Due Dates
Content of Balance Sheet Account Reconciliations
Supporting Documentation
Segregation of Duties
Responsibilities for Balance Sheet Reconciliations by role
Balance Sheet Reconciliation Preparer
Balance Sheet Reconciliation Approver
Balance Sheet Reconciliation Reviewer
System for Storing Reconciliations
Pre-set Expectations of Balances and Auto-certification against these Expectations
Tolerance Thresholds for Unreconciled Items
Timeframe for Resolution of Unreconciled Items
Reporting
Part C - Natural Account and Associated Reporting Hierarchy
Background
Responsibilities and Required Actions
Types of Permitted Changes
Requests for New Natural Accounts
Requests for changes to existing Natural Accounts
Requests for changes to the MR or FA Hierarchical mapping of existing Natural Accounts
Requests for changes to the narrative description of MR or FA Hierarchical mapping code, with no change to the mapping of the underlying Natural Accounts to existing Hierarchies
Timetable for Review, Approval and Processing of Approved Changes
Approvals Process and Evidence of Approvals
System to be updated
Person responsible for overseeing update of relevant system
Reporting
Approvals for Changes to Natural Accounts or Associated Reporting Hierarchies – for all entities in the Group
Impact of change
Approval required from:
Director, Financial Operations, Tax and Treasury, or nominee
Head of Accounting Advisory & Controls
Head of Group Financial Planning and Analysis
Other approver
Part D - Inter-company
Background
Responsibilities and Required Actions
Recording of Inter-Company Transactions - Permitted Natural Accounts
Pass-through of Transactions from One Entity to Another
Recording of Inter-company Transactions – Invoices
Recording of Inter-company Transactions – Accruals
Elimination of Inter-Company Transactions for Group Reporting
Dispute Resolution of Inter-Company Transactions
Part E - Financial Materiality Guideline
Concepts of materiality
Financial Statements Materiality
Quantitative Factors - Materiality Thresholds
Qualitative factors in assessing materiality
Materiality and the external audit process
Materiality for completeness of entity level financial statements
Materiality for re-allocation of transactions within an entity – for management reporting
Summary – Financial materiality thresholds
Materiality for completeness of entity level financial statements
Materiality for re-allocation of transactions within an entity – for management reporting needs
Risk Matrix as applied to concepts of financial materiality
Section 3 - Guidelines
Section 4 - Definitions
View Document
This is not a current document. To view the current version, click the link in the document's navigation bar.
Frequency
Reconciliation closing balance - thresholds for Balance Sheet Reconciliation Reviewer to complete a reconciliation quality review
University
MQ Health
U@MQ
Other types of reconciliation requiring review, regardless of balance [all entities]
Never
<$500k
<$100k
$<$10k
-
Annual: December
$500k - $2m
$100-$400k
$10 - 40k
provisions, leases, non- current assets
Bi-annual
$2 - $5m
$400k - 800k
$40 - 80k
GRNI, stock, accruals
Quarterly
>$5m
> $800k
$80k
bank and AR and AP sub- ledgers, major pre- payments, deferred and accrued revenue
University $ value of unreconciled item
Controlled Entities value of unreconciled item as % of full year budgeted expenditure
Time frame for resolution from initial identification of Unreconciled Item
$0 - $50,000
0 – 0.1%
Three months
$51,000 - $100,000
0.1 – 0.5%
Two months
> $100,000
> 0.5%
One month
> $500,000
> 1%
Two weeks plus immediate notification by Approver to Director, Financial Operations, Tax and Treasury
> $1,000,000
> 2%
Two weeks plus immediate notification by Approver to Director, Financial Operations, Tax and Treasury and Deputy Group Chief Financial Officer
General Ledger, Calumo, Blackline, Purchase-to-Pay
Manager, Finance IT
Caseware
Head of Accounting Advisory and Controls
Additions / changes to name and / or purpose of Natural Account
Change to Natural Account name only
Yes
No
No
Approval by manager who owns either the system interface or the manual journal procedure that impacts this account
Change to Natural Account name and business purpose
Yes
Yes
No
New Natural Account
Yes
No
No
Impact on MR Hierarchy Mapping – management reporting
Change to mapping in MR Hierarchy – at level 1 - 4 of Hierarchy*
Yes
No
Yes
n/a
Change to mapping in MR Hierarchy – at level 5 or 6 of Hierarchy**
Yes
No
Yes
n/a
Impact on MR vs FA Hierarchy reconciliation template
Yes
No
Yes
n/a
Changes to FA Hierarchy Mapping and Caseware – external reporting
Change to mapping in FA Hierarchy – at level that impacts the face of a Primary Statement or a row within a Note to a Primary Statement in Caseware
Yes
Yes
No
n/a
Prior year Caseware impact
Yes
Yes
No
n/a
Changes to general accounting month-end scripts and processes
Impact on teaching revenue deferral
Yes
No
No
Revenue Manager, Financial Operations
Impact on non- teaching revenue deferral script
Yes
No
No
Revenue Manager, Financial Operations
Impact on indirect costs script
Yes
No
No
Manager, Expenditure Operations Opex/Capex, Financial Operations
Impact on interest allocation script
Yes
No
No
Revenue Manager, Financial Operations
*This is the level that will impact the Calumo report Profit & Loss Account and Balance Sheet Report at a Compact roll-up level. **This is the level that will impact the Calumo report Profit & Loss Account and Balance Sheet Report at a Detailed report level.
$ value of disputed item
Timeframe for resolution from initial identification of disputed item
$0 - $10,000
Three months
$11,000 - $50,000
Two months
> $50,000
One month
*AASB 2018-7 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards – Definition of Material. **AASB 2018-7 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards – Definition of Material.
*AASB Practice Statement 2 Making Materiality Judgements
*Auditing Standard ASA 450 Evaluation of Misstatements Identified during the Audit
Threshold per omitted / incorrectly calculated transaction / invoice
When threshold applies
General Ledger major accounts with no external reporting requirements by major account
0.0025% of annual expenses for the entity
e.g., $25,000 for the University
Every month-end
General Ledger major accounts with external reporting requirements by major account [e.g., research funding acquittal]
1% of annual income for the relevant major account
Minimum: month-end before the next external reporting period
*Including for the University: accurate assignment of prepayment criteria when raising Purchase Requisitions; timely and accurate receipting of invoices in P2P to enable accurate P2P accruals and prepayments; cash allocation and receipting; effective execution of scripts for deferred revenue, infrastructure costs, payroll interface, payroll accruals and depreciation; plus routine major revenue and expenditure accruals. Including for Controlled Entities: Timely and accurate journals to transfer financial data from various source systems into the relevant general ledger (including for all key revenue streams, cost-of-goods-sold, debtors, deferred revenue, cash allocation, receipting and creditors) plus routine major revenue and expenditure accruals.
Threshold per incorrect location of transaction / invoice
When threshold applies
General Ledger major accounts with no external reporting requirements by major account
0.0025% of annual expenses for the entity
e.g., $25,000 for the University
Every month-end
General Ledger major accounts with external reporting requirements by major account [e/g/ research funding acquittal]
0.5% of annual income for the relevant major account
Minimum: month-end before the next external reporting period
Party
Topic
Threshold as a % of total entity annual expenses
Example $ threshold for University entity
AONSW
Guide for assessing material error to entity level financial statements in the University sector
Modelled at
2-3% of expenses
$20-$30m
AONSW
Guide for any identified error individually large enough for reporting to Audit & Risk Committee
Typically, 5-10% of 0.1-0.15% of the AONSW overall materiality threshold noted above i.e.
$1m - $1.5m
Audit and Risk Committee
Guide for assessing material error to financial statements
Typically
1.5% - 2% of expenses
$15m - $20m
Finance team
Threshold for manual journal correction of missing transaction – refer Part B of this paper - [assuming no external reporting needs by major account]
0.0025% of expenses
$25k
Finance team
Threshold for manual journal correction of missing transaction – refer Part B of this paper [where external reporting is required by major account to a funder provider]
0.5% of annual income for the relevant major account.
Accuracy frequency: as a minimum, the month-end before the next external reporting period.
n/a
Finance team
Threshold for manual journal correction of incorrect general ledger location of transaction – refer Part C of this paper - [assuming no external reporting needs by major account]
0.0025% of expenses
$25k
Finance team
Threshold for manual journal correction of incorrect general ledger location of transaction – refer Part C of this paper [where external reporting is required by major account to a funder provider]
0.5% of annual income for the relevant major account.
Accuracy frequency: as a minimum, the month-end before the next external reporting period.
n/a
Potential impacts of a financial error in the entity-level full-year draft Financial Statements, as presented by management for audit
Type of consequence
Consequence Rating
Minimal
Minor
Moderate
Major
Severe
Impact on entity level full-year reported results in audited Financial Statements.
< 0.1% of full year entity-level expenses
For Uni: $<1m
0.1% - 1.5% of full-year entity expenses
For Uni: $1-15m
1.5% - 2% of full-year entity expenses
For Uni: $15-20m
2-3% of full year entity expenses
For Uni: $20-30m
>3% of full year entity expenses
For Uni: $>30m
AONSW – external auditors
Likelihood of receiving qualified [‘non-clean’] audit opinion if corrections not made to financial statements
very unlikely
unlikely
possible
likely
Very likely / certain.
Concerns about the entity may be raised to the Auditor General
Impact for Audit and Risk Committee (ARC) and Council
No errors reported by AONSW at ARC.
Several (individually non-material) errors reported by AONSW at ARC.
ARC may require non-material amendments to financial statements before recommendation to Council.
ARC may require significant amendments to financial statements before recommendation to Council.
ARC likely to require significant amendments to financial statements before recommendation to Council.
ARC very likely/certain to require significant amendments to financial statements before recommendation to Council.
Impact for control environment
n/a
Management assessment of any necessary control remediation.
Internal Audit into area of concern possible.
Changes to processes and controls likely.
Internal Audit into area of concern likely.
Major changes to processes and controls likely.
Internal Audit into area of concern almost certain.
Major changes to processes and structures and controls likely.
Top of Page