Bulletin Board - Document Comments

Bulletin Board - Review and Comment

Step 1 of 3: Comment on Document

There are 3 steps in the submission process. You must complete all three steps in one session, otherwise your comments will be lost.

1. Use this Protected Document icon to open a comment box.

2. Type your feedback and then click the"Save Comment" button in the lower-right of the comment box.

3. Do not open more than one comment box at the same time.

4. When you have finished making comments, go to step 2 by clicking on the “Save and Continue” button at the very bottom of this page.

Important Information

During the comment process you are connected to a database. Like internet banking, the session that connects you to the database may time-out due to inactivity or if you close your browser or go to a different tab/window and try to come back.

To ensure that your comments are received:

  1. DO NOT jump between web pages/applications while logging comments.

  2. DO NOT log comments for more than one document at a time.

  3. DO NOT leave your submission unfinished. If you need to take a break, submit your current set of comments now and return later to make a further submission. You will receive a copy of your comments so that you can see what you have already said.

  4. DO NOT exit from the interface until you have completed all three steps of the submission process.  Simply saving a comment in the comment box does not mean it is submitted and if you exit the system, you will not be able to retrieve it later.

When you finalise your submission in step 3 your comments will be emailed to the Document Author with a copy to you, and to policy@mq.edu.au for record keeping purposes.

Course of Study Accreditation Policy

Section 1 - Purpose

(1) This Policy and its Procedures specify the principles and process by which new award courses of study (courses) are accredited by Macquarie University (the University).

(2) This Policy supports the quality, integrity and relevance of the University’s suite of courses, which provide students with an academic experience that meets their needs, as well as the requirements of industry and disciplinary fields, in alignment with national and global priorities, and meets applicable regulatory requirements.

Scope

(3) This Policy applies to all Macquarie University award courses that align with the categories of the Australian Qualifications Framework, with the exception of the Doctor of Philosophy.

(4) This Policy does not apply to existing courses requiring Reaccreditation (see Course of Study Reaccreditation Policy) or revisions to an existing course unless the revision requires the course to be considered as a new course (see Course of Study Revision Policy).

(5) This Policy does not apply to Non-award programs of study.

Top of Page

Section 2 - Policy

(6) Course Accreditation is designed to ensure that all new courses:

  1. are fit for purpose and meet all internal and external requirements and standards;
  2. contribute to the University’s strategic direction;
  3. are subject to thorough credible, effective and fair governance; and
  4. benefit from consultation with relevant industry partners and professional associations.

(7) Course Accreditation is informed by:

  1. the Delegations of Authority Register;
  2. the Australian Qualifications Framework and the Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2021;
  3. current pedagogical and professional developments in education and the specific discipline field(s) relevant to each course; and
  4. course-specific benchmarking against national and, where appropriate, international comparators.

(8) A new course is accredited (approved) by Academic Senate subsequent to recommendation by the relevant Faculty/College Board following approval of the strategic and business case for a proposed new course (see the New Educational Products Policy).

(9) A new course will only be accredited when all of its core zone units and, where applicable, course components, have been approved by the relevant Faculty/College Board/s.

(10) Once a course is approved by Academic Senate, it is accredited for up to seven (7) years during which time it will be regularly monitored and reviewed in accordance with the Course of Study Monitoring and Review Policy. Prior to the end of its accreditation period, the course will be assessed for Reaccreditation in accordance with the Course of Study Reaccreditation Policy.

(11) A new course that has been accredited by Academic Senate may also require accreditation by an external body for professional and industry recognition to meet intended course outcomes. External accrediting bodies and dates are recorded on the Course Reaccreditation Schedule (CRS).

Top of Page

Section 3 - Procedures

(12) Following approval by the Vice-Chancellor to proceed with a new course proposal (see New Educational Products Policy) a new course proposal will be completed by the relevant Course Authority in the Curriculum Management System.

(13) The design of the new course and its constituent components must comply with:

  1. the Curriculum Architecture Policy; and
  2. the Assessment Policy.
Top of Page

Section 4 - Guidelines

(14) Nil.

Top of Page

Section 5 - Definitions

(15) The following definitions apply for the purpose of this Policy:

  1. Accreditation means the process where the design of a new academic item (course, course component or unit) is undertaken followed by the submission of an academic case through the pertinent academic governance process.
  2. Course Authority is the person assigned by a Faculty or equivalent to perform certain roles at a course level, for example Course Director, Head of Department, Program Director.
  3. Curriculum Management System refers to Macquarie University’s repository for all curriculum information including courses, course components (majors, specialisations, and minors), and units.
  4. Non-award program of study is a sequence of learning that does not culminate in a qualification with the Australian Qualifications Framework.
  5. Reaccreditation means the process where the formal appraisal of a course against institutional and course specific domains takes place, involving a group of academics, professional experts, and stakeholders.