Bulletin Board - Document Comments

Bulletin Board - Review and Comment

Step 1 of 3: Comment on Document

There are 3 steps in the submission process. You must complete all three steps in one session, otherwise your comments will be lost.

1. Use this Protected Document icon to open a comment box.

2. Type your feedback and then click the"Save Comment" button in the lower-right of the comment box.

3. Do not open more than one comment box at the same time.

4. When you have finished making comments, go to step 2 by clicking on the “Save and Continue” button at the very bottom of this page.

Important Information

During the comment process you are connected to a database. Like internet banking, the session that connects you to the database may time-out due to inactivity or if you close your browser or go to a different tab/window and try to come back.

To ensure that your comments are received:

  1. DO NOT jump between web pages/applications while logging comments.

  2. DO NOT log comments for more than one document at a time.

  3. DO NOT leave your submission unfinished. If you need to take a break, submit your current set of comments now and return later to make a further submission. You will receive a copy of your comments so that you can see what you have already said.

  4. DO NOT exit from the interface until you have completed all three steps of the submission process.  Simply saving a comment in the comment box does not mean it is submitted and if you exit the system, you will not be able to retrieve it later.

When you finalise your submission in step 3 your comments will be emailed to the Document Author with a copy to you, and to policy@mq.edu.au for record keeping purposes.

Course of Study Revision Policy

Section 1 - Purpose

(1) This Policy supports the continual enhancement of the quality, integrity and relevance of the University’s suite of award courses of study (courses) and documents the process by which courses can be subject to revision.

Scope

(2) This Policy applies to all Macquarie University award courses that align with the categories of the Australian Qualifications Framework excluding Doctor of Philosophy awards.

(3) This Policy does not apply to new units of study or course components for delivery in a new course of study which is being finalised for Accreditation (see Course of Study Accreditation Policy).

(4) This Policy does not apply to non-award programs of study with the exception of the following programs offered by the Macquarie University College:

  1. Standard Foundation Program;
  2. Intensive Program; and
  3. Masters Qualifying Programs.
Top of Page

Section 2 - Policy

(5) Course revision processes ensure that any changes to a course, including revisions to any of its constituent parts (i.e. units and/or course components):

  1. have been approved through an academic governance process;
  2. continue to comply with all institutional policies; and
  3. continue to meet agreed institutional, disciplinary, and regulatory standards regarding expected quality in education and the student experience.

(6) Changes to a course that fundamentally alter the expected outcomes, design and/or delivery requiring markedly different graduate capabilities and/or a capacity to meet new community expectations, do not constitute a revision and require a new course proposal.

(7) A course revision does not change the timing for the monitoring, review or Reaccreditation of a course unless specifically stated.

Top of Page

Section 3 - Procedures

(8) A proposed revision to a course and/or any of its constituent parts is completed by the relevant authority in the Curriculum Management System.

(9) In completing the proposal for approval, appropriate consultation should be undertaken to confirm that the revisions of a course or any of its constituent components ensure that:

  1. students can continue to meet relevant learning outcomes of the course and/or unit and/or course component; and
  2. the proposed revision/s to the course or any of its constituent parts will not impact on the successful delivery of another approved course.

(10) A management plan may be required to be submitted to the relevant approval authority, where a revision to a course impacts the timely progression of students:

  1. currently enrolled within that course; and/or
  2. currently enrolled in another award course (with an internal or external provider) where there is an approved articulation pathway to the course that is being revised.

(11) Where a management plan is required (in accordance with clause 10), this must:

  1. outline how impacted students will be managed to mitigate the impact of the revision to their ability to complete their studies in a timely fashion;
  2. include, where relevant, any proposed dates by which impacted students must complete their studies in order to mitigate the impact to their timely completion; 
  3. include, where relevant, a communication strategy that ensures all impacted students are made aware of the revision to the course, the manner in which the revision is impacting them and any relevant dates in accordance with clause 11(b).

(12) Approval of a revision to a course and/or any of its constituent parts is conducted in alignment with the Delegations of Authority Register (Section 5).

Top of Page

Section 4 - Guidelines

(13) Nil.

Top of Page

Section 5 - Definitions

(14) The following definitions apply for the purpose of this Policy:

  1. Accreditation means the process where the design of a new academic item (course, course component or unit) is undertaken followed by the submission of an academic case through the pertinent academic governance process.
  2. Curriculum Management System means the University’s‘single source of truth’ and repository for all curriculum information including courses, course components (majors, specialisations, and minors) and units.
  3. Reaccreditation means the process where the formal appraisal of a course against institutional and course specific domains takes place, involving a group of academic, professional experts and stakeholders.